<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SchoolStickers &#187; Academic Research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.schoolstickers.co.uk/blog/category/rewardsystems/academic-research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.schoolstickers.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>Read our blog for the latest School Stickers News.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:18:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Times &#8211; Cornell Research backs School Prizes.</title>
		<link>http://www.schoolstickers.co.uk/blog/2010/03/09/times-cornell-research-backs-school-prizes/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=times-cornell-research-backs-school-prizes</link>
		<comments>http://www.schoolstickers.co.uk/blog/2010/03/09/times-cornell-research-backs-school-prizes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>School Stickers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rewards in the Press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schoolstickers.co.uk/blog/?p=88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Times Article reports on a Cornell University study on prize based rewards. To quote the article:
&#8220;Jackson found that pupils who benefited from the Texas high school programme  not only went to college in greater numbers, but also continued to improve  their grades and remained in college longer.
His 46-page report finds “no evidence [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7052546.ece" target="_blank">Times Articl</a><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7052546.ece" target="_blank">e </a>reports on a <a href="http://works.bepress.com/c_kirabo_jackson/">Cornell University study</a> on prize based rewards. To quote the article:<a href="http://www.schoolstickers.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Cornell_logo.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-89 alignright" style="border: 20px solid white;" title="Cornell_logo" src="http://www.schoolstickers.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Cornell_logo-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
<p>&#8220;Jackson found that pupils who benefited from the Texas high school programme  not only went to college in greater numbers, but also continued to improve  their grades and remained in college longer.</p>
<p>His 46-page report finds “no evidence of worse outcomes” and concludes “that  incentive programmes may have lasting positive effects even after rewards  are no longer provided. Providing monetary incentives to both students and  teachers &#8230; can lead to meaningfully improved student outcomes”.&#8221;</p>
<p>The article also pulls information about the debate on prizes where some consider if defacto bribery leading to a dependence on rewards and others consider it a stepping stone to an intrinsic and long term love of learning. We all know that every school, every pupil is different. This research, and this article, provide some more colour in the motivation debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.schoolstickers.co.uk/blog/2010/03/09/times-cornell-research-backs-school-prizes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

